Neo-Liberalism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Neo-Liberalism - Essay Example use, with private businesses, wealth trickles downwards from the rich capital owners to the middle class and low income earners, since businesses and industries create jobs. These jobs, together with the revenue they churn, help pump money into the economy, and thereby leading to more jobs. Because of the above standpoints, the government should let markets be controlled by market forces, so that there is free international trade (Philoguy, 1). Opponents of neo-liberalism criticize it for its unregulated free markets as is promoted by neoliberals by arguing that free markets deny governments of sources of revenue, since governments are not supposed to exact tariffs on goods and services that are being traded. Again, the same argue that leaving markets and industries in the hands of market forces automatically means, making a dereliction on price controls and consumer protection. This therefore paves way for exploitation of the masses by entrepreneurs and rich capital owners. There are others who see unregulated free markets as unfeasible because it is based on assumptions that markets are equal yet they are not (Luxton and Braedley,

The destruction of all Nuculear Weapons Research Paper

The destruction of all Nuculear Weapons - Research Paper Example Analysis†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..4 7. Conclusion†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..10 References Abstract The paper is a discussion paper based on the adverse effect of the nuclear weapons. It discusses about the several hazards the development and the usage the nuclear weapons have. The paper supports the argument in favor of the destruction or renouncement of the nuclear weapon, which is a means of mass destruction. Reaction Statement Should human beings attempt to urge the power game forward by deploying nuclear weapons or should he take steps towards renouncing nuclear weapons for the sustainability of mankind? Explanation of the reaction stat ement The reason of choosing this statement is not only concerned about the mass destruction that the nuclear weapon creates but also about the obsessive desire of few countries to gain military superiority and supremacy. 66 years ago, at the dawn of August 6, 1945 the entire city of Hiroshima was shaken with a destructive nuclear bomb attack from US. It was soon followed by another nuclear bomb attack on August 9, 1945 at the city of Nagasaki in Japan. The whole world witnessed how in a span of time the cities with its population of 100,000 to 200,000 individuals went into the clutch of death, devastation and destruction. (Dahat, 2009, p. 1) The most important question that arises now is that whether the entire human species can simply stand and witness the destruction of his fellow being or will he act to destroy the human killing weapons and let humanity flourish. (Makhoul, n. d, p. 82) Defining the issues addressed Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons of mass destructi on, which threatens the life of all the living beings living on the planet. The paper discusses the several grounds on which it deem essential for the elimination of the nuclear weapons. After the wreck the nuclear attack had created in 1945, the nations of the world should understand that the destruction created by nuclear attack of any kind havocs demolition. The paper discussed the several adverse effects of the deploying of nuclear weapons. It has harmful effects on environment and the living beings. It is also against the self and other imposed limitations and ethics of war. Position on the reaction question In the discussion paper the stand taken is in the favor of the destruction of the nuclear weapon and thus states that human being should take a firm step against the usage of nuclear weapons in any form. It criticizes the development and usage of the nuclear weapon under any circumstances. Doing something wrong is regarded as sin, likewise just standing and watching someone doing wrong is a sin as well. The paper focuses on the fact that despite of the presence of Non Proliferation Treaty (NTP), the world is under the threat of destruction of the humanity. The NTP rather than minimizing the threats aggravates it and to some extent favors the Nuclear Weapon States (NWS) state against the non Nuclear Weapons States (NNWS). Analysis It has been known that today the nuclear warheads of the World, Russia and US have ten times more arsenals than what it had during bombing the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is known that nuclear weapons have not been used after the 1945 attack on Japan but there have been several instances